What Insurance Do You Need for Bag Shipments: CIF or All-Risk?

What Does Marine Cargo Insurance Cover?

Marine cargo insurance covers the goods against loss or damage during the insured transit, subject to the clauses and the exclusions in the policy. The transit is defined by the policy rather than by the delivery term, and the standard warehouse-to-warehouse wording runs from the place the goods leave at origin to the place they arrive at destination.

The important word is "subject to the clauses". There is no single thing called marine insurance that covers a shipment; there is a policy with a named set of clauses, an insured value, an attachment point and a termination point, and all four are negotiable. Two shipments described as insured can have very different cover.

What Are Institute Cargo Clauses A, B and C?

They are the standard graded sets published through the Lloyds market. Clauses (A) is all-risk: it covers all risks of loss or damage except the stated exclusions. Clauses (B) is a middle set. Clauses (C) is a named-perils set: it responds to fire, explosion, vessel or craft casualty, jettison, general average and a short list besides, and to nothing that is not on the list.

Two qualifications belong on the grading, because the names mislead. Clauses (B) is not halfway between (A) and (C) in any useful sense — it is its own list, and the losses that matter to bags either appear on it or do not. And Clauses (A) is not automatically the clause set in a policy described as comprehensive. Ask for the letter.

The distinction decides almost every bag claim. Water ingress through a container roof is not a named peril. Pilferage at a transhipment port is not a named peril. Carton crushing from bad stowage is not a named peril. Under Clauses (C) none of the three is covered, and those three are what actually happens to soft goods at sea.

What Does CIF Oblige the Seller to Provide?

Under CIF the seller must procure, at its own cost, cargo insurance covering the goods from the port of shipment to at least the port of destination. Incoterms 2020 sets the default level at Institute Cargo Clauses (A) or similar unless the parties agree otherwise, which was a change from the pre-2020 default of the narrower Clauses (C).

There is a third obligation that is easy to overlook and causes the most friction: the seller must provide the policy or certificate as a shipping document, endorsed where necessary so the buyer can claim. A CIF shipment that arrives with the goods and without the certificate has not discharged the obligation, and a buyer that accepts the goods without asking for it has no document to claim on.

Two obligations come with it. The seller must provide the policy or certificate to the buyer as part of the shipping documents, and the insured value must be at least the invoice value plus 10% by convention. Neither obligation gives the buyer any control over the insurer, the clauses or the claims handling.

Why Is the Default Level Not Enough for Bags?

Because the default is a floor, not a specification, and because the buyer is claiming on somebody elses paper. Even where the clauses are adequate, the buyer did not choose the insurer, does not have the broker relationship, and has to be given the document before it can claim at all.

A third problem specific to a CIF claim is the survey. Under the buyers own policy the buyer appoints the surveyor and controls the timing. Under a sellers policy the survey is arranged through the sellers broker, and a survey that happens a week after delivery is a survey of goods that have already been moved, sorted and partly disposed of. Ask who appoints the surveyor before you need one.

There is a second problem specific to bag cargo: the insured value. The convention of invoice value plus 10% is meant to cover anticipated profit and freight, and on a branded programme the margin is frequently higher than that. A claim settled on an insured value set 10% above invoice does not make the buyer whole.

What Does All-Risk Exclude Anyway?

Quite a lot, and the exclusions are the part buyers do not read. All-risk is not everything-risk. Ordinary leakage and ordinary loss in weight or volume, loss arising from the insufficient or unsuitable packing of the goods, loss arising from inherent vice or the nature of the subject matter, delay, and insolvency of the carrier are all commonly excluded.

Three practical points make the exclusion manageable. Keep the carton specification with the shipment records so it can be produced. Photograph the packing at stuffing, which is free evidence of suitability. And keep the inspection report at AQL 2.5, which shows the goods left in the condition stated.

There is one further exclusion that deserves its own paragraph because it is the one brokers argue about most: delay. A shipment that arrives late but undamaged has no claim, because delay is excluded. That means a schedule failure is a commercial risk to be managed with planning and buffer, not an insurance risk to be transferred, and confusing the two is how buyers end up with a policy they resent.

The packing exclusion is the one that bites bag programmes, because unsuitable packing is exactly how a crushed carton appears to the insurer. That is why the inspection record and the carton specification matter to a claim: they are the evidence that the packing was suitable and the damage was caused in transit rather than by the packing.

How Is the Insured Value Set?

Conventionally at the invoice value plus an agreed percentage, commonly 10%, intended to cover anticipated profit and freight. It is a convention rather than a rule, and it is negotiable in both directions. Where the buyers margin, or the cost of replacing the goods at short notice, exceeds the conventional uplift, the insured value should be raised.

Set it deliberately rather than by default, and state the currency. A policy written in one currency and a loss incurred in another introduces an exchange question into the claim, and that is an argument nobody needs while a container of damaged bags is sitting in a warehouse.

When Does Cover Attach and When Does It End?

The standard marine transit wording runs warehouse to warehouse: cover attaches when the goods leave the place named in the policy at origin and terminates on delivery at the place named at destination, or on expiry of a stated period after discharge. The exact wording matters, because goods sitting in a consolidation warehouse or a terminal are in the gap that buyers assume is covered.

Ask for the attachment and termination points in writing and check them against the delivery term. Under FOB the risk passes on board but the goods were in a terminal before that; under DDP the seller carries the risk but the policy may terminate at the port. Neither mismatch is fatal and both are easy to close with a clause.

What Is the Claim Process and What Evidence Is Needed?

Notify immediately, preserve the evidence, and document before you move anything. The notice period in the clauses is short and it runs from the date of discovery. The evidence set is the insurance policy or certificate, the commercial invoice, the packing list, the bill of lading with its on-board date, photographs of the damage before anything is moved, and a survey report where the loss is significant.

One last item belongs on the checklist and it is administrative: a named person at the destination who is authorised to accept a damaged delivery, note it and start the notification. A claim that waits for somebody to decide who is responsible has usually missed its notification period by the time the decision is made.

The photographs are the part people fail at, because the natural reaction on opening a damaged container is to start sorting the goods. Photograph the container, the seal, the stow and the damaged cartons before anything is touched, and note any damage on the delivery document at the time of delivery. Photograph in sequence: the outside of the container, the seal number, the container interior before unloading, and then each damaged carton before it is opened. It is the sequence that makes the set usable. The full sequence is set out in How to handle damaged bag shipments.

Should You Use an Annual Open Cover Instead?

A fourth advantage of an open cover is less obvious and more valuable: it makes the insured value a policy decision rather than a per-shipment default. A buyer on single-voyage cover accepts invoice value plus 10% every time because changing it is an argument; a buyer on an open cover sets it once, at the right figure, and it applies to every declaration.

For a programme running more than a handful of shipments a year, usually yes. An annual open cover is a standing policy under which each shipment is declared, and it brings three advantages: a rate that reflects the annual volume rather than a single voyage, one clauses set you have read once, and one claims contact who knows your cargo.

It also removes the administrative failure that catches single-voyage buyers: forgetting to arrange cover at all. Under FOB nobody is obliged to insure, and a buyer that books a container, arranges the entry and never places the policy has taken the risk on itself without noticing. An open cover makes that mistake impossible.

What Should You Ask an Insurer or Broker?

Ask for the clause set, the insured value basis, the attachment and termination points, the exclusions that apply to your commodity, and the claims procedure including the notification period. Five questions, and an insurer that answers all five is an insurer you can claim against.

Three further questions are worth adding for a first placement: what is the deductible, what is the claims notification address and out-of-hours contact, and does the policy follow the goods into a consolidation warehouse. The third is the one that catches buyers on less-than-container shipments, where the goods sit in a warehouse before the vessel loads and nobody has checked whether the policy reaches that far.

Where the answer is that the policy does reach a consolidation warehouse, get it in writing and note the period allowed. Where it does not, there is a gap between the goods leaving the production site and the policy attaching, and that gap is the buyers risk under every term that transfers risk before loading. One clause closes it and it costs nothing to ask for, which is the argument for asking rather than assuming.

Then ask one question that is not about the policy: has this insurer handled a claim on this commodity before? Bags generate specific arguments about packing, inherent vice and condensation, and an insurer that has never met them will meet them for the first time on your claim.

Freight bands and transit windows in this cluster are planning ranges drawn from quoted lots, not published tariff rates. They move with bunker cost, vessel rotation, port congestion and the week you book; ask for a live quotation against your sailing before you commit the order to a calendar.

Frequently Asked Questions

People Also Ask