How Is a Reorder RFQ Different From a First-Order RFQ?

Most buyers send the same enquiry template on a repeat that they sent the first time. It works, in the sense that it produces a quote, and it throws away the single advantage a reorder has: the existence of an approved run with recorded measurements.

A first-order enquiry is a development request. A reorder enquiry is a control document. The first asks whether something can be made and at what price; the second asks whether something will be repeated, under which revision, against which retained reference, and what has changed since the last run.

What Question Does a First-Order RFQ Ask?

It asks four things: can this be made, what will it cost, how long will it take, and how much is the minimum. Those are development questions, and they are answered by sampling, costing and a calendar. Nothing can be compared, because nothing exists yet.

Because nothing exists yet, the first enquiry has to carry the full description: drawings, materials, construction, artwork, quantity, target price, incoterm and destination. Every field is open, and every open field is a decision someone will make later, usually under time pressure.

The first enquiry also has to establish the commercial baseline: what the minimum is, what the sampling charge is, what the tooling costs, and how the calendar reads including sampling. Those four are open questions on a first order and settled facts on a repeat, which is a large part of why the repeat should be quicker to quote.

That openness is also why a first-order quote takes longer to arrive and longer to trust. Every field carries an assumption, and an assumption in a quote is a decision that will be made later by whoever happens to be holding the order.

What Question Does a Reorder RFQ Ask?

It asks four different things: will this match the approved run, under which revision, with which materials, and what has changed since the last one. Price and calendar matter, but they are the fourth and fifth questions rather than the first and second.

That reordering of the questions is the whole point. A repeat enquiry that leads with price invites a quote built to a price, which is where unrecorded substitutions come from. A repeat enquiry that leads with the revision invites a quote built to a specification.

Which Fields Carry Over and Which Drop Away?

Carry over: quantity, incoterm, destination, packing requirement and the required documents. Drop away: the drawing package, the material discovery, the artwork development and the construction discussion - all of which were resolved at approval and now live in the spec file.

One field behaves differently and is worth calling out: the minimum. On a first order it is a discovery, because nobody knows yet what the material purchases will allow. On a repeat it is a known figure with a known exception, and the enquiry should say which of the two the booking falls under.

What Must a Reorder Enquiry Cite?

Six items: the style code, the colourway, the revision number of the spec file, the run number it follows, the quantity, and the incoterm. Those six let the quote be built against a known starting point rather than against a memory of what was made last time.

The third of those items is the one usually missing, and it is the one that makes the others usable. A quote that cites the previous run number can be checked against that run's comparison sheet, which is the fastest way to see whether a price change is a material change.

Where the buyer has never quoted a repeat before, the first repeat enquiry is also the moment to ask for the comparison sheet from the previous run if it was never sent. Getting it then costs nothing; asking for it after a dispute has started costs a great deal more and produces a document written under pressure.

Add a seventh item where the programme has agreed one: the inspection requirement, stated as a sampling plan and a defect classification rather than as a level. That is the sentence that makes the inspection comparable between runs rather than improvised on the day.

How Is Price Quoted on a Repeat?

Ideally as the previous price plus a stated explanation for any movement: a material cost change, a quantity change, a specification change or a currency movement. Four possible reasons, and a repeat quote that cites which one applies can be checked in minutes.

A repeat quote that simply arrives at a new number is harder to read, because a lower figure and a higher figure are both ambiguous. The question is not whether the number moved but what moved it, and that question has an answer only when the quote says so.

Ask for the quote to name the component lines that changed, even where the price did not. A repeat quote that lists zero changed lines is a strong statement and worth having in writing, because it is the sentence that makes a later substitution a breach rather than a misunderstanding.

Where the quantity changes, ask for the price effect separately from any material effect. Ask also whether the smaller quantity changes the dye-lot or the trim purchase, because a quantity that drops below a mill or a trim minimum can force a second purchase with a different lot, which is a consistency risk rather than a cost one. Quantity moves the unit figure through setup and marker efficiency; material moves it through the purchase. Separating the two is what lets a buyer see whether a smaller order is being quoted on the same specification.

What Changes About Sampling on a Reorder?

Usually nothing needs sampling at all. Where the style, the materials, the construction and the revision are unchanged and the retained reference is intact, the repeat goes straight to bulk, which is 35-50 days from written approval, and the comparison happens at inspection.

Where something has changed, sampling is 6-10 working days from a signed-off tech pack, or 12-15 working days for a complex style. That is the honest window, and it is worth booking deliberately rather than hoping the repeat can skip it.

Why Does Quantity Below the Standard Minimum Get Discussed?

The standard is 500 pcs per style and colourway, because below that the material purchases, the machine setup and the cutting marker stop being efficient. On a repeat, 300 pcs is open to discussion, because the pattern, the markers, the tooling and the references already exist.

What makes the smaller quantity viable is precisely the fact that nothing has to be developed. That is the trade: the buyer gets a lower quantity and the programme keeps a single revision, a single register and a single retained reference.

There is a second reason the smaller quantity is easier on a repeat: the material purchases are already understood. On a first order the buyer is also paying for the uncertainty in those purchases, because a mill minimum, a dye-lot minimum and a trim minimum all have to be absorbed into one run.

The trade-off to be honest about is that a smaller quantity changes the inspection arithmetic. A smaller lot takes a smaller sample under ISO 2859-1, which means the same acceptance quality limit is being judged on less evidence, and a buyer who cares about a property should say so rather than accept the smaller sample by default.

What Should Be Attached to a Reorder Enquiry?

Four attachments: the spec file revision being ordered, the component register if any line is under review, the previous comparison sheet if the buyer wants the new run matched to it, and the packing and marking requirement. Four files, one message.

How Is the Quote Compared With the Previous One?

Line by line, in four columns: the previous figure, the new figure, the difference, and the stated reason. Where a reason is missing, ask before ordering rather than after. The reason is the part that tells you whether the product has changed.

Compare the specification lines as well as the price lines. A quote can hold the price and change the material, and that is the substitution that costs the most, because it is invisible in the only column most buyers read.

Where the two quotes differ on the specification, resolve that before ordering rather than after. A specification difference agreed in an email and never written into the file is the origin of most disputes about what a repeat was supposed to be, and it is the least expensive disagreement a programme will ever have.

Keep both quotes filed together. A quote comparison that survives to the next booking becomes the price history of the style, and it is the fastest way to see whether a figure that moved last year was a material change that has since been reversed or a permanent shift in the cost base.

What Mistakes Cost the Most on a Reorder Enquiry?

Five, in descending order of cost: not citing the revision, not naming the previous run, not flagging a component that is known to be at risk, not attaching the packing requirement, and asking for a price without asking what changed to produce it.

All five are clerical and all five cost little to fix at the enquiry stage. None of them is inexpensive once the run has been cut, which is the argument for spending an extra ten minutes on the document that starts it.

Frequently Asked Questions

People Also Ask