How Do You Handle a Bag Order Change After Sample Approval?

Every programme reaches the point where somebody wants to change something after production has started, and the response on both sides is usually emotional rather than arithmetic. The buyer wants the change because a downstream fact has moved; the seller resists because work has been done. Both positions are reasonable, and the way out is to know what has physically happened by that date. This piece sets out what counts as a change, where each kind of change stops being possible, and how to price and schedule the ones that remain.

What Counts as a Change and What Counts as a Clarification?

A clarification resolves ambiguity in an existing specification without altering the article: confirming a stitch colour that was specified as "to match", or confirming a hardware finish that was named generically. A change alters the article: a different foam, a different closure, a different dimension, a different artwork. The distinction matters because a clarification should be free and a change should be priced, and because the two are frequently confused in the heat of a production week.

Where Is the Cut-Off Point for Each Kind of Change?

At the moment the relevant work begins, and each kind of change has its own moment. Artwork and branding can change until the branding operation starts. Trims and hardware can change until they are fitted, subject to what has already been bought. Panels, foam and dimensions can change until cutting starts. Colourways can change until material is dyed or bought. After each of those moments, the change is still physically possible and involves scrapping what has been done.

That scrapping is the whole of the cost, and it is why the schedule effect usually exceeds the money effect. Re-cutting a panel is not expensive in material; it is expensive in line time, because the line is a queue and the job loses its place. A change that costs USD 40 in material can cost a week in the calendar, and the week is what the buyer actually feels.

What Does a Change Cost in Money?

Three elements: the work already done, the material already bought or committed, and the new work. The first is the one buyers forget, because it is invisible — panels cut, liners welded, branding applied, all of which have to be done again. The second is the one sellers forget, because a material bought for this order may be re-usable elsewhere. The third is straightforward.

The honest way to ask is to ask for the three separately, because the answer then becomes negotiable. Where the work already done is small, the change is inexpensive. Where the material can be used on another order, the buyer should not pay for all of it. And where the new work is a re-run of a setup that already exists, it should cost less than it did the first time. Three questions, and the price usually comes down.

What Does a Change Cost in Days?

More than the estimate, and the reason is the queue. A production line is a sequence of jobs with reserved slots, and a job that stops for a change loses its position. The arithmetic of the change itself — re-cutting, re-branding, re-packing — is usually days. The arithmetic of re-entering the queue is the variable, and it depends on what else is booked, on whether a holiday period is approaching, and on whether the material can be obtained in time.

Ask the question in that form: what is the work, and what is the queue. A desk that answers only the work is giving a partial answer, and the buyer who plans on it will be wrong. Where the answer is unacceptable, the other option is usually to split: run the remaining quantity to the original specification and put the change into the next order, which keeps the date and defers the decision.

How Do You Write a Change Order?

What changes

The field, from what value to what value

Why

The reason, so the desk can suggest a better route

Effective point

Which units are affected: all, or those not yet started

Cost

The three elements separately: work done, material, new work

Schedule

The completion date as recalculated

Approval

Who approves on each side, and by when

Specification update

The revision number the change creates

Reorder effect

Whether the change carries to later orders

One field deserves emphasis because it is the one most often omitted: the effective point. A change that applies to all units and a change that applies only to units not yet started are very different propositions, and the difference is frequently the whole cost. Where a buyer asks for a change mid-run, the first question back should be how many units are already past the affected operation.

What Happens When the Change Is Not the Buyer Choice?

The common case is a material that becomes unavailable or a component that is discontinued, and the treatment should be the same in reverse: written, with the effect stated, and with an approval right for the buyer. A substitution is not an administrative detail, because it can change performance, appearance and compliance at the same time. Where the substituted material touches a declaration or a test report, the test may have to be repeated.

The buyer position is strongest where the confirmation says so. A clause requiring written approval for any material substitution, with the effect on price, schedule and compliance stated before implementation, converts a unilateral change into a joint decision. Without it, the buyer discovers the substitution at inspection, which is the worst possible moment, because the goods are finished and the schedule is gone.

How Do You Decide Whether to Make the Change at All?

Compare the cost of the change against the cost of not making it, and be honest about the second. Not making a change means shipping an article the buyer already knows is wrong in some respect, and that has a downstream cost in returns, in retail relationships, or in a relaunch. Where the downstream cost is larger, make the change and take the delay. Where it is smaller, ship and correct on the next order.

How Do You Record a Change for the Next Order?

As a specification revision with a date, and as a replacement of the sealed reference where the change affects the built article. That is the whole of the record, and it is the step most often skipped because the change feels closer to an event than to a document. Skipping it means the next order is built to the old revision, and the same change is discovered again at the same point in the run.

Where the change was made to rescue a production problem rather than to improve the product, record that too, in one line. A future buyer reading the file needs to know which changes were deliberate and which were repairs, because a repair that is carried into a reorder becomes a permanent feature nobody chose. One line at the time saves that conversation later.

How Do You Keep the Schedule After a Change?

By protecting the phases that catch defects. When a window is compressed to absorb a change, the phases that lose time are the material check, the inline inspection and the packing check — and those are the three that find problems before the goods leave. A better trade is to take the time out of the assembly float, or to accept a partial shipment, or to move the date.

A partial shipment is underrated here. Where a change affects only part of the quantity, shipping the unaffected portion on the original date and the rest later keeps a downstream commitment partly intact, and it costs nothing in quality. It does require the confirmation to permit partial shipment, which is one line and is best written at the start rather than added at the shipping stage.

How Do You Prevent Changes Before Production Starts?

Most mid-production changes originate in a field left open at sign-off, and the fields that cause them are consistent: artwork not finalised, hardware named generically, foam thickness left to the desk, and a colour reference not stated. Each of those looks harmless at the enquiry stage and each becomes a change order at the branding or cutting stage. Closing four fields before the deposit prevents most of the category.

The second prevention is a review meeting held before the deposit rather than after the sample. Twenty minutes with the drawing, the material list and the artwork state on the table, and the open fields become visible. Where a field genuinely cannot be closed, assign it an owner and a date rather than leaving it open, because an open field with an owner is a task and an open field without one is a future change order.

What Does a Change Do to the Reorder?

It carries, unless the change order says otherwise, and that is the outcome most buyers want once they think about it. A change made to improve the product should be in the next build; a change made to rescue a production problem should not. The distinction is rarely recorded, and the result is that a reorder is sometimes built to a drawing that was superseded during the run.

The fix is one line in the change order: whether the change creates a new specification revision that later orders follow, or whether it applies to this order only. Where it creates a revision, the sealed reference sample has to be replaced as well, because a reference that does not reflect the current revision is worse than no reference. Where it does not, the original revision stays live and the reorder is built to it.

How Does the Change Rule Appear in the Confirmation?

As three sentences. Any change to the specification, quantity or schedule is agreed in writing before implementation. A change may affect price, the completion date, or both, and the effect is stated before the change is made. Any material substitution requires written approval, with the effect on compliance and testing stated. Three sentences, and they cover the overwhelming majority of what goes wrong in this stage.

Add a fourth where the buyer wants it: an approval right for any substitution that changes a documented field, with the right to inspect before acceptance. That is a stronger position and it is reasonable on a first order with an unfamiliar counterparty. It is less reasonable on a documented repeat, where the relationship and the reference sample already do most of the work.

What Should the Buyer Do When a Change Is Refused?

Ask what would make it possible, because a refusal is usually about a specific constraint rather than about unwillingness. The constraint is often the queue, the material lead time or a downstream commitment to another programme, and each suggests a different shape: a smaller change, a later effective point, or a split shipment. A refusal that cannot be explained is worth treating as a warning about how the rest of the programme will run.

Where the change genuinely cannot be made, the decisions left are to ship as specified or to stop. Stopping is rarely right, because the work done is sunk either way and the buyer then has no goods and no leverage. Shipping as specified, with the change recorded for the next order, is usually the better outcome, and the record is what makes the next order correct.

Frequently Asked Questions

People Also Ask